Enhanced Athlete Stands Its Ground Against Nutrition Distribution

Enhanced Athlete is a private firm registered in Wales and in England. Owner, Charles Hughes Anthony, and Enhanced Athlete’s Chief Operating Officer for the USA, Scott Cavell Edward are the founders of the said firm. Shaun Corrigan who oversees the United Kingdom operations is one of the firm’s directors.

The Enhanced Athlete Coaching was established with the main objective of assisting people in the achievement of their desired physique. The department for coaching have coaching programs that were formulated by Tony Hughes and the coaching staff of Enhanced Athlete. The online marketing webpage for Enhanced Athlete, Enhanced Gear, is the promotional site of the company, and it oversees the sales of the company’s products such as hoodies, snapback stringers, and performance joggers among others. The sister companies of Enhanced Athlete are Prosource Performance Products, Gaspari Nutrition, Nutrex Research, Universal Nutrition, and Maximum Human Performance.

The lawsuit filed by Nutrition Distribution against Enhanced Athlete has been closed since Enhanced Athlete was able to prove to the District Court Judge of California to overrule the order appeal of Nutrition Distribution. Enhanced Athelete stated the fact that Nutrition Distribution has made it a modus operandi of filing lawsuits then settling the matter outside of the court. Enhanced athlete presented proof that nutrition distribution has filed more than 70 lawsuits versus other companies engaged in the distribution of health products like Enhanced Athlete.

Enhanced Athlete claims that Nutrition Distribution prods supplemental companies to answer the case filed and then sends desist letters to settle the matter outside the courtroom. The Wyoming outlet of Enhanced Athlete stated that it received similar letters from Nutrition Distribution, containing demands for payment to settle its lost shares due to the dishonest advertisement of Enhanced Athlete’s products that had a negative impact on the sales of Nutrition Distribution.

In addition, Enhanced Athlete maintained that Nutrition Distribution was not able to give proper evidence that the advertisement of Enhanced Athlete caused Nutrition Distribution’s sales loss. Enhanced Athlete CEO Scott Cavell said that the company will not give in to the extortion tactics of Nutrition Distribution. And due to the foregoing proofs and arguments of Enhanced Athlete, the Judge from the District Court of California denied the plea of Nutrition Distribution in support of Enhanced Athlete.

The legal counsel of Enhanced Athlete said that the Court has decided in favor of Enhanced Athlete against Nutrition Distribution because the latter was not able to show adequate proof between its sales loss and Enhanced Athlete’s deceitful advertisement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *